MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 26.4 points higher (52.4 vs 26.0) but costs 25× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $231; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 52.4 | +101.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $5,786.78 | +2404.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 25× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.58s | 40.70s | −17.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 17.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 101.5% more intelligence, 2404.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill