MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 0.5 points higher (26.5 vs 26.0) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($286 vs $231; both mid-range class). Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning).
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 26.5 | +1.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 1.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $286.07 | +23.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 23.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.47s | 6.32s | −87.2% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 87.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 1.9% more intelligence, 23.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill