MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 50.8% less intelligence, 470.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 12.8 | −50.8% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 50.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $1,318.62 | +470.6% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 5.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.48s | 16.18s | −67.3% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 67.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill