MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 50.0% less intelligence, 151.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 21.1 | −50.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 50.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $98.47 | $247.26 | +151.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.21s | 6.61s | −85.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 85.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
MiMo-V2.5-ProQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill