MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 50.3% less intelligence, 153.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.9 | 21.3 | −50.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 50.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $98.86 | $250.18 | +153.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.34s | 4.63s | −90.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 90.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
MiMo-V2.5-ProQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill