MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 64.6% less intelligence, 244.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 9.2 | −64.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 64.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $138.26 | $476.23 | +244.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 3.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 55.75s | 6.95s | −87.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 87.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 32.10 for $108.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.5-ProQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill