MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 64.6% less intelligence, 379.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 9.2 | −64.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 64.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $138.26 | $662.85 | +379.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 4.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 87.35s | 7.71s | −91.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 91.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.50 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill