MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Trinity Large Thinking vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 56.4% less intelligence, 157.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.9 | 18.7 | −56.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 56.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $98.86 | $254.72 | +157.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 45.85s | 14.08s | −69.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 69.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.23 / $0.88 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
MiMo-V2.5-ProTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill