MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Trinity Large Thinking vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 58.7% less intelligence, 274.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 10.9 | −58.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 58.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $138.26 | $518.07 | +274.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 3.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 72.58s | 8.78s | −87.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 87.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
MiMo-V2.5-ProTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill