MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 0.5 points higher (38.4 vs 37.9) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $110; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 37.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash when 37.9 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 38.4 | +1.3% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 1.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $1,607.86 | +1367.7% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.26s | 25.45s | −48.3% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 48.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1.3% more intelligence, 1367.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill