MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 27.7% more intelligence, 9.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.7 | 34.1 | +27.7% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 27.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $106.14 | $95.73 | −9.8% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 9.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 67.46s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Muse Ember (Xhigh) scores 34.10 for $95.7.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill