MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 7.2 points higher (45.1 vs 37.9) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $110; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 37.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash when 37.9 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 45.1 | +19.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 19.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $1,655.27 | +1411.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.53s | 29.94s | −39.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 39.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 19.0% more intelligence, 1411.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 39.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill