MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 14.5 points higher (52.4 vs 37.9) but costs 53× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $110; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 37.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash when 37.9 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 52.4 | +38.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 38.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $5,786.78 | +5182.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 53× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.26s | 40.70s | −17.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 17.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 38.3% more intelligence, 5182.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill