MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 25.0 points higher (37.9 vs 12.9) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($110 vs $92.8; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Lightning.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 12.9 | −66.0% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 66.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $92.76 | −15.3% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 15.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.63s | 8.98s | −81.5% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 81.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.06 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 66.0% less intelligence, 15.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/nemotron-3-5-lightning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/nemotron-3-5-lightning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill