MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-FlashOn the frontier
Intelligence
37.90
Total cost
$110
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricMiMo-V2.6-FlashQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)37.926.7−29.6% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 29.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$109.55Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)49.53s15.88s−67.9% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 67.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.14 / $0.28$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerMiMo-V2.6-Flash: what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill