MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 14.0% more intelligence, 56.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.9 | 34.1 | +14.0% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 14.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $220.73 | $95.73 | −56.6% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 56.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 50.93s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
MiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill