MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 27.2% less intelligence, 740.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 33.7 | −27.2% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 27.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $1,737.18 | +740.6% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 8.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.82s | 21.59s | −55.8% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 55.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill