MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-ProOn the frontier
Intelligence
46.30
Total cost
$207
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricMiMo-V2.6-ProQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)46.326.7−42.3% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 42.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$206.66Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)44.97s16.26s−63.8% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 63.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.43 / $0.87$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerMiMo-V2.6-Pro: what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill