MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 60.7% less intelligence, 333.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 18.2 | −60.7% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 60.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $896.39 | +333.8% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 4.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.69s | 47.48s | −4.4% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 4.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.38 / $2.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
MiMo-V2.6-ProQwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-6-35b-a3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-6-35b-a3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill