MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Trinity Large Thinking vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 76.7% less intelligence, 12.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 10.8 | −76.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 76.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $232.95 | +12.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 12.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.29s | 8.30s | −82.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 82.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.6-ProTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill