MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenBMBMiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.70
Total cost
-
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricMiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3BQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)5.726.7+368.4% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 4.7× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported17.14s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerMiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B: what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minicpm-v4-6-1-3b/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minicpm-v4-6-1-3b/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill