MiniMax-M2.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)

MiniMax-M2.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.1Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8 27B (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
26.20
Total cost
$1060
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricMiniMax-M2.1Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)20.926.2+25.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 25.4% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,060.08— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)44.43s55.56s+25.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 25.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $1.20$0.50 / $3.00
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerMiniMax-M2.1: what beats itQwen3.8 27B (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m2-1/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m2-1/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill