MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M2.7 by MiniMax or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) scores 0.1 points higher (22.9 vs 22.8) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($596 vs $243; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiniMax-M2.7.
| Metric | MiniMax-M2.7 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.8 | 22.9 | +0.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 0.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $243.38 | $596.33 | +145.0% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.78s | 15.29s | −71.6% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 71.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.60 / $2.70 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.7: 0.4% more intelligence, 145.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M2.7 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
MiniMax-M2.7Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m2-7/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m2-7/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill