MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 36.7 points higher (42.7 vs 6.0) but costs 7.5× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.7 | 6.0 | −85.9% Ministral 3 14B is 85.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $283.18 | $37.56 | −86.7% Ministral 3 14B is 86.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 22.76s | 7.88s | −65.4% Ministral 3 14B is 65.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: 85.9% less intelligence, 86.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMinistral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill