MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 2.4 points higher (45.1 vs 42.7) but costs 5.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $283; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 42.7, and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when 42.7 is enough.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.7 | 45.1 | +5.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 5.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $283.18 | $1,655.27 | +484.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 5.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 22.73s | 28.35s | +24.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 24.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: 5.6% more intelligence, 484.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMuse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill