MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Qwen3.7 Plus vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: 41.0% less intelligence, 51.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 99.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.7 | 25.2 | −41.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 41.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $283.18 | $427.73 | +51.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 51.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.52s | 47.00s | +99.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 99.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill