MiniMax-M3 vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3: 80.4% more intelligence, 89.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 50.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.9 | 34.1 | +80.4% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 80.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $878.03 | $95.73 | −89.1% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 89.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.17s | 9.48s | −50.5% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 50.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
MiniMax-M3Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill