MiniMax-M3 vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 11.7 points higher (29.2 vs 17.5) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($538 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiniMax-M3 when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.2 | 17.5 | −40.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 40.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $537.98 | $145.77 | −72.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 72.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.47s | 24.76s | −2.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 2.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs MiniMax-M3: 40.1% less intelligence, 72.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
MiniMax-M3Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill