MiniMax-M3 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiniMax-M3: 53.1% less intelligence, 22.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.4 | 21.3 | −53.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 53.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $204.82 | $250.18 | +22.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 22.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.25s | 4.63s | −80.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 80.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
MiniMax-M3Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill