MiniMax-M3 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 18.4 points higher (29.2 vs 10.8) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($538 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick MiniMax-M3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.2 | 10.8 | −63.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 63.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $537.98 | $232.95 | −56.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 56.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.74s | 8.30s | −69.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 69.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs MiniMax-M3: 63.0% less intelligence, 56.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiniMax-M3Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill