Ministral 3 14B vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 14B by Mistral or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Medium 3.5 scores 8.2 points higher (14.2 vs 6.0) but costs 34× as much to run the benchmark ($1264 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Ministral 3 14B | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.0 | 14.2 | +136.7% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.56 | $1,263.80 | +3264.7% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 34× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.05s | 17.68s | +119.6% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 119.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.20 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Ministral 3 14B: 136.7% more intelligence, 3264.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 119.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Ministral 3 14BMistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill