Ministral 3 14B vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 14B by Mistral or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 33.6 points higher (39.6 vs 6.0) but costs 37× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Ministral 3 14B | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.0 | 39.6 | +560.0% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 6.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.56 | $1,385.40 | +3588.5% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 37× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.05s | 21.43s | +166.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 166.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.20 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Ministral 3 14B: 560.0% more intelligence, 3588.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 166.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Ministral 3 14BMuse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill