Ministral 3 14B vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 14B by Mistral or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) scores 6.7 points higher (12.7 vs 6.0) but costs 6.2× as much to run the benchmark ($234 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Ministral 3 14B | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.0 | 12.7 | +111.7% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.56 | $233.56 | +521.8% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 6.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.88s | 21.63s | +174.5% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 174.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.20 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Ministral 3 14B: 111.7% more intelligence, 521.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 174.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Ministral 3 14BQwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill