Ministral 3 14B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 14B by Mistral or Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) scores 12.4 points higher (18.4 vs 6.0) but costs 25× as much to run the benchmark ($941 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Ministral 3 14B | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.0 | 18.4 | +206.7% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 3.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.56 | $940.97 | +2405.2% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 25× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.88s | 65.18s | +727.2% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 727.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.20 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) vs Ministral 3 14B: 206.7% more intelligence, 2405.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 727.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Ministral 3 14BQwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/qwen3-5-397b-a17b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/qwen3-5-397b-a17b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill