Ministral 3 14B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 14B by Mistral or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 19.2 points higher (25.2 vs 6.0) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Ministral 3 14B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.0 | 25.2 | +320.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 4.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.56 | $427.73 | +1038.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.05s | 46.15s | +473.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 473.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.20 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Ministral 3 14B: 320.0% more intelligence, 1038.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 473.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Ministral 3 14BQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill