Ministral 3 14B vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 14B by Mistral or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 34.2 points higher (40.2 vs 6.0) but costs 84× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $37.6; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Ministral 3 14B | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.0 | 40.2 | +570.0% Qwen3.8 Max is 6.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.56 | $3,172.37 | +8346.1% Qwen3.8 Max is 84× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.89s | 62.08s | +686.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 686.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.20 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Ministral 3 14B: 570.0% more intelligence, 8346.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 686.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Ministral 3 14BQwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill