Ministral 3 14B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 14B by Mistral or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 3.2 points higher (9.2 vs 6.0) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($405 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 Coder Next when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Ministral 3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.0 | 9.2 | +53.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 53.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.56 | $405.10 | +978.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.18s | 6.20s | −13.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 13.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.20 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Ministral 3 14B: 53.3% more intelligence, 978.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 13.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Ministral 3 14BQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill