Ministral 3 14B vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 14B by Mistral or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Trinity Large Thinking scores 4.8 points higher (10.8 vs 6.0) but costs 6.2× as much to run the benchmark ($233 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Trinity Large Thinking when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Ministral 3 14B | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.0 | 10.8 | +80.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 80.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.56 | $232.95 | +520.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 6.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.97s | 8.30s | +19.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 19.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.20 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Ministral 3 14B: 80.0% more intelligence, 520.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Ministral 3 14BTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-14b/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill