Ministral 3 3B vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 3B by Mistral or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Glimmer (High) scores 12.7 points higher (17.5 vs 4.8) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($146 vs $12.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Glimmer (High) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | Ministral 3 3B | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 4.8 | 17.5 | +264.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 3.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $12.23 | $145.77 | +1091.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 3.07s | 24.76s | +706.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 706.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.10 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Ministral 3 3B: 264.6% more intelligence, 1091.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 706.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Ministral 3 3BMuse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-3b/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-3b/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill