Ministral 3 3B vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 3B by Mistral or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 34.8 points higher (39.6 vs 4.8) but costs 113× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $12.2; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | Ministral 3 3B | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 4.8 | 39.6 | +725.0% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 8.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $12.23 | $1,385.40 | +11227.9% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 113× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 3.06s | 21.43s | +600.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 600.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.10 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Ministral 3 3B: 725.0% more intelligence, 11227.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 600.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Ministral 3 3BMuse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-3b/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-3b/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill