Ministral 3 8B vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 8B by Mistral or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Trinity Large Thinking scores 5.3 points higher (10.8 vs 5.5) but costs 8.5× as much to run the benchmark ($233 vs $27.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Trinity Large Thinking when you need intelligence above 5.5, and Ministral 3 8B when 5.5 is enough.
| Metric | Ministral 3 8B | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 5.5 | 10.8 | +96.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 96.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $27.47 | $232.95 | +748.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 8.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.40s | 8.25s | +52.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 52.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.15 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Ministral 3 8B: 96.4% more intelligence, 748.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Ministral 3 8BTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-8b/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-8b/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill