Mistral Large 3 vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 3 by Mistral or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 30.3 points higher (39.6 vs 9.3) but costs 30× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $46.4; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 3 | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.3 | 39.6 | +325.8% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 4.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $46.41 | $1,385.40 | +2885.1% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 30× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.17s | 20.85s | +190.8% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 190.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $1.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Mistral Large 3: 325.8% more intelligence, 2885.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 190.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Mistral Large 3Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill