Mistral Large 3 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 3 by Mistral or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Trinity Large Thinking scores 1.5 points higher (10.8 vs 9.3) but costs 5.0× as much to run the benchmark ($233 vs $46.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Trinity Large Thinking when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 3 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.3 | 10.8 | +16.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 16.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $46.41 | $232.95 | +401.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 5.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.18s | 8.30s | +15.6% Trinity Large Thinking is 15.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $1.50 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Mistral Large 3: 16.1% more intelligence, 401.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 15.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Mistral Large 3Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill