Mistral Large 3 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 3 by Mistral or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Trinity Large Thinking scores 1.2 points higher (10.9 vs 9.7) but costs 4.0× as much to run the benchmark ($518 vs $130; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Trinity Large Thinking when you need intelligence above 9.7, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 3 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 10.9 | +12.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 12.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $129.94 | $518.07 | +298.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 4.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.32s | 8.78s | +19.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 19.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $1.50 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Mistral Large 3: 12.4% more intelligence, 298.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 22.30 for $42.6.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Mistral Large 3Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill