Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 19.0 points higher (25.3 vs 6.3) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($2923 vs $182; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 6.3 | −75.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 75.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,923.39 | $181.95 | −93.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 93.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.54s | 25.07s | −1.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 1.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.70 / $2.10 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 75.1% less intelligence, 93.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 29.60 for $121.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewMuse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-preview/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-preview/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill