Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 18.0 points higher (43.3 vs 25.3) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($5414 vs $2923; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Large 4 Preview.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 43.3 | +71.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 71.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,923.39 | $5,414.45 | +85.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 85.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.54s | 40.64s | +59.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 59.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.70 / $2.10 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 71.1% more intelligence, 85.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.00 for $4766.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-preview/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-preview/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill