Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 9.6 points higher (25.3 vs 15.7) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($2923 vs $1460; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 27B (Low).
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 15.7 | −37.9% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 37.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,923.39 | $1,460.07 | −50.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 50.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.54s | 60.61s | +137.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 137.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.70 / $2.10 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 37.9% less intelligence, 50.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 137.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewQwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-preview/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-preview/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill