Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-30.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 7.6 points higher (25.3 vs 17.7) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($2923 vs $250; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 17.7, and Beam 1.0 when 17.7 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 17.7 | −30.0% Beam 1.0 is 30.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,923.39 | $249.83 | −91.5% Beam 1.0 is 91.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.42s | 9.42s | −61.4% Beam 1.0 is 61.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.70 / $2.10 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 30.0% less intelligence, 91.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 61.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.10 for $190.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-preview/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4-preview/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill