Mistral Large 4 (High) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 (High) by Mistral or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Mistral Large 4 (High): 30.7% more intelligence, 93.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 (High) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.1 | 34.1 | +30.7% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 30.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,359.61 | $95.73 | −93.0% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 93.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.68s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.70 / $2.10 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Mistral Large 4 (High)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill