Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 20.9 points higher (38.4 vs 17.5) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.4 | 17.5 | −54.4% Muse Glimmer (High) is 54.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,607.86 | $145.77 | −90.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 90.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.73s | 24.76s | −3.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 3.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.36 / $4.18 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 54.4% less intelligence, 90.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewMuse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill